|
pushing config changes out to routers: msg#00110network.nsp.cisco
While we're more or less on the subject, I'd be curious to see how various networks manage pushing mass configuration changes (BGP filters, regular password changes, updates to standard configs, etc) out to their boxes. >From past experience I'll hazard a guess that this is largely custom applications that people have specifically tailored to their needs. Specifically, I'm interested in what safeguards people put in place to 1) hopefully prevent a typo in a master config database from getting pushed out to lots of devices, possible causing a large outage, and 2) integrity checking of the pending config beyond things like making sure that a static route has the correct next-hop address, e.g. things like if interface X has access-group Y applied to it, make sure that access-list Y actually exists... Awhile back I wrote a fairly extensive system for backing up configurations from network devices I'm responsible for and storing them in a journaled format so I can pull an old revision if needed. While it wouldn't be especially tough to add the functionality in it to allow the system to upload a modified config to a router, I specifically left that piece out because I was still grappling with the safeguard issue. Thoughts/insight are greatly appreciated. jms _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: 12.3T - a niiiiice feature :): 00110, Gert Doering |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: pushing config changes out to routers: 00110, John Osmon |
| Previous by Thread: | 12.3T - a niiiiice feature :)i: 00110, Tomas Daniska |
| Next by Thread: | Re: pushing config changes out to routers: 00110, John Osmon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |