|
RE: Continuos Ping from Interface to Interface: msg#00019network.nsp.cisco
It sounds like you need to monitor latency and when it crosses a threshold, you need an alert so you can login and perform diagnostics to identify the culprit. As rpcbind hinted, SAA is your likely choice and it does have the requirement for scripting unless you use IPM. You could probably set it up to send an snmp trap however, associate that with an email alert and ouila. But once you know it's occuring, you still have to figure out what is occurring. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products_configur ation_guide_chapter09186a00800ca63e.html Ahem. A sniffer or protocol analyzer would be superior to the nbar suggestion--since if traffic or certain types of errors are causing the problem--an analyzer is the best choice. But they arent cheap--which is why you could rent one or even bring in a consultant for a one time engagement. Also, the analyzer would tell you definitely if streaming is the cause. If you dont have access to one, I guess you'll be looking at show interface for errors and sh ip account and sh top on the switch to find top talkers. You could apply an ip any any ACL and log it....not a bad idea either in a troubleshooting scenario...others may disagree. good luck... -----Original Message----- From: rpcbind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpcbind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 1:41 PM To: Richard Golodner Cc: 'cisco-nsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' Subject: Re: [nsp] Continuos Ping from Interface to Interface NTP peering between point-to-point interfaces is always an easy way of watching overall latency (sh ntp assoc). If you want to get more involved, search cisco's site for 'SAA', though I've never found it very useful without spending some time scripting data collection and such (though once this is done, its great). For your specific problem, despite problems on larger platforms, using nbar to break out protocol stats would probably be a good start. However on a 1720, you'll have to go up to 12.2T or 12.3 for the functionality. If you really do just want to do pings, just enable and use the extended ping ('# ping'), where you can fire off as many pings as you want and check the data at the end (marginally usefull, but you asked...) On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Richard Golodner wrote: > I am seeing high latency on many of my private frame circuits and > want to know if I can pinpoint the problem by running some type of > continuos ping from my remote router back to corporate. I a m > suspecting that one or some of my users are using some type of > streaming media, which is prohibited by our AUP. > I have searched the cisco.com site and have tried google groups, > perhaps my search strings are not correct, but if anyone can give me a > quick pointer I would be most grateful. I am running a 1720 with 12.1 > (1) at all locations. > Thank you, Richard Golodner > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Microsoft SMB exploits: 00019, Wilson, Dan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Booting from FTP: 00019, Lars Erik Gullerud |
| Previous by Thread: | Microsoft SMB exploitsi: 00019, Wilson, Dan |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Cisco to non-Cisco vpn: 00019, Richmond, Jeff |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |