Re: Is net-snmp AgentX considered production ready?

William R. Buckley wrote:

> I have used Net-SNMP predecessor UCD_SNMP, version 4.2, and 
> found the AgentX support to be perfectly fine for production work.  Now
> that the development crew has had the chance to improve the product
> for some three years, I suspect the AgentX features are correspondingly
> improved.  My product is still in use, so what ever are the problems you
> believe with Net-SNMP, I never found any. 
I don't know what problems there might be, I was just curious which the 
known bugs are. Then I can decide if I can handle them through some 
workaround or by not using the particular feature that triggers such a bug.

> Dave Shield then remarked
> to me that he was then unsure about AgentX stability but, not funtion.
> What say you now, Dave?
>  
Perhaps this should have been addressed to the list?

/Andreas Vinsander




-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users