|
RE: UCD-DISKIO and fiber/EMC disk: msg#00244network.net-snmp.user
It's going to increase the memory footprint somewhat, but I suspect not drastically. Short of a complete rewrite, there's no way to make this go away. How about a nice round number like 128, at least for Solaris? >> Found the problem. In diskio.c we have the line... > >> #define MAX_DISKS 20 > >> You've got more than 20 disks - don't you. >Yes, I do. Would it harm anything if I increase that value and rebuild, perhaps up to 80-100? This communication is intended for the use of the recipient to which it is addressed, and may contain confidential, personal and or privileged information. Please contact us immediately if you are not the intended recipient of this communication, and do not copy, distribute, or take action relying on it. Any communication received in error, or subsequent reply, should be deleted or destroyed. ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: exec cache?: 00244, Alan Sparks |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: exec cache?: 00244, Robert Story |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: UCD-DISKIO and fiber/EMC diski: 00244, Steve Ferguson |
| Next by Thread: | RE: UCD-DISKIO and fiber/EMC disk: 00244, Steve Ferguson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |