>>>>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:53:42 -0500, Vinod Johnson
>>>>> <Thomas.Johnson@xxxxxxx> said:
Vinod> Could you give me a ballpark figure of how much work you think
Vinod> may be involved in a VxWorks port? A breakdown of tasks will be
Vinod> really good too.
I really don't have this information yet, unfortunately. My guess is
that the largest quantities of work will be:
1) porting the code itself and ensuring it compiles and works. Should
be a fairly small percentage of work, but worth noting.
2) porting the agent MIB infrastructure. This is probably 95% of the
work load. Since I know some patches for this are likely available
for the ucd-snmp suite, it's likely that much of this can be
Incorporated from there.
Vinod> Another question is about the VxWorks port that was done a
Vinod> while ago. I assume that it did not have any v3 support. Any
Vinod> further work that was done in that regard?
I need to go track down the information myself, as I forgot. I'm
pretty sure it was based on a early 4.x line of code, which means it
would have v3 support (which was the major new feature in 4.0).
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
|
