|
Re: Question on host/newtork load: msg#00370network.nagios.user
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Gilles Poiret wrote: > Hi, > > I plan to monitor a large network (spread : worldwide, 30 equipments, 60 > services to begin) I have to have very accurate information, so checks > will occur every 1 or 2 min, I think.( for instance, to catch a reboot) An interval of less than 5 minutes is not reasonable when actively monitoring a device on the other side of the world. You basic packet latency is going to be in the order of seconds depending on the bandwidth. > > First point > ----------- > > I'm wondering about the type of Nagios host required (CPU, memory,...) in > that configuration, and if the volume of equipments/services raise (x2, for > instance) > ( Is a PIII 750 Mhz, 256 Mo RAM enough ?) > > This host will also run MRTG, to view bandwidth on 20 equipments. Shouldn't have any problem. - make sure your disk is fast and watch your disk I/O > > Second point > ------------ > which is the bandwidth overhead generated by those checks ? Is there a way to > evaluate it by advance ? > run a couple of the service chesk your are interested in and do a packet capture - tcpdump/ethereal... -sg > I'd like feedback from people who are using Nagios on that context. > > > Thanks for advance, > -- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: Setting up service dependencies: 00370, Jeff Boulter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: disk_check_smb ==> No Output !?: 00370, Subhendu Ghosh |
| Previous by Thread: | Question on host/newtork loadi: 00370, Gilles Poiret |
| Next by Thread: | RE: 2.0, who's using what, etc.: 00370, Pettersson, Magnus |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |