Subject: RE: redhat 7.3 - msg#00362

Previous Message by Date: click to view message preview

RE: I'm sure that no one has done this...but....

I've got gmake 3.76.1 and gcc 2.95.1. I'm specifying my own ping command, however when I run "make all" I get the following syntax error on plugins/Makefile. # make all UX:make: WARNING: No suffix list. Making all in plugins UX:make: ERROR: line 758: Syntax error. *** Error code 1 (bu21) UX:make: ERROR: fatal error. Thoughts and help from anyone is appreciated. Thanks, Paul C. On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 04:12, Ewan Leith wrote: > I've done it on AIX, which is fairly different from the norm, the only issue > was that it required gcc and gmake to compile, the aix toolset didn't cope. > > Ewan > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paul Crossman [mailto:pcrossma@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: 26 August 2002 22:22 > > To: Nagios Users List > > Subject: [Nagios-users] I'm sure that no one has done this...but.... > > > > > > Has anyone successfully built the plugins for SCO UnixWare 7.1.1? > > > > Paul C. > > > > -- > > Paul Crossman @ Wildfire Communications, Inc. > > Senior Unix Systems Administrator > > Phone & Fax: 781-778-3517 > > Email: pcrossma@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old > > cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! > > https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 > > _______________________________________________ > > Nagios-users mailing list > > Nagios-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users > > -- Paul Crossman @ Wildfire Communications, Inc. Senior Unix Systems Administrator Phone & Fax: 781-778-3517 Email: pcrossma@xxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390

Next Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: Processors required for Nagios

> About your sizing: 512 Mb of RAM? Come on, I've just ordered a home PC > for myself with that amount of memory. I can only agree with Brian: given > the price of RAM, buy some more. Our Netsaint server has got 1 Gb, and is > pretty happy with it (read: using it): > Mem:  1029852K av,  897404K used,  132448K free,       0K shrd,  107944K buff > Swap: 2096472K av,   32320K used, 2064152K free                  637028K > cached Actually these figures suggest that 512Mb would be adequate. The 637Mb of "cached" is actually free memory being used as disk cache. Most modern OSes make use of free memory as extra cache space, it is a good use for it and can be easily allocated to more pressing requirements without pageing. Dave ! ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390

Previous Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Re: redhat 7.3

I'm running it on 7.3 without a problem. You might be missing a necessary library or need to make sure that you installed all errata. For the etc directory you need to make install-config On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 20:02, Shawn Zayac wrote: > > > Has anybody installed nagios on RedHat 7.3? I'm having problems > compiling it. I'm getting segmentation errors while compiling the core in > math.h, but it still finished. However I'm missing the etc directory from > the nagios directory. Now the plugins will not compile at all. Is it not > compatible with 7.3? > > > > Shawn > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old > cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! > https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 > _______________________________________________ > Nagios-users mailing list > Nagios-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users -- Brian Whitehead - A+, LCP, RHCE Systems Administrator - Linux Consultant Direct: 816.512.9417 Mobile: 816.215.1598 mailto:brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Whitehead Consulting Group 1505 Bradford Drive Greenwood, MO 64034 Phone: 816.537.7170 http://www.whiteheadconsulting.com ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390

Next Message by Thread: click to view message preview

notification_period and hosts.cfg

I would like to run this by the group and see if I understand notification periods correctly. I have a host with a notification period of 24x7 and checking two services, both with a notification period of 9-5, but different contact groups. I understand that if a service goes down from 9-5, then everybody in the contact group is notified for that particular service. I also understand that if a service goes down and it does not fall into the time period for that service, no contacts are sent out. I do not understand the notification_period parameter in hosts.cfg. If the host goes down, who receives notification, since it isn't defined anywhere? Do both groups defined at the service level receive notification even if it is outside of 9-5? Also, if the service is 24x7, but the host is 9-5, does the host take precedence over the service and would the contact group still receive notification if the time was outside of 9-5? Regards, Todd Jones Network Administrator Weir Slurry 608-221-5805 phone 608-221-5807 fax ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390