Re: Licq: search issues

Hello,


I also noticed that starting a search shows strangely formatted line in
network window:

I'm looking for an UIN# (one of you test UIN, Jon), and get the following
lines in network loq:

12:02:02: [SRV] Starting search by UIN for user (#14499/#1021)...
12:02:02:       Jon test (NNNNNNN) < , >

is this the expected format in log?


Regards,

On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:18:33 +0200 wwp <subscript@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hello there,
> 
> 
> I've faced a few issues in the search dialog (current CVS):
> 
> - no way to type/paste a value in the lineedit when searching by UIN#
> 
> - the tab caption is Uin#, then the lineedit label is UIN#. Shouldn't be UIN#
> for both since it's an acronym?
> 
> The attached patch solves the two issues above (as well as uses a more
> appropriate upper bound value for the validator).
> 
> - when you search by UIN#, if you get a match (I never got 0 match anyway),
> you see the following message in status bar: "65536 more users found. Narrow
> search.". This message is obviously wrong.
> 
> - the lower bound value (10000) of the QIntValidator used for UIN# seems not
> effective. You are able to type values <10000, and that's expected 'cause
> the Qt widget+validator allows you type small values (otherwhise you would not
> be able to type at all), but maybe the validator's result is simply
> ignored/not used because you get no warning when leaving the lineedit and you
> are able to go on working with such small value (at least the search is
> possible. It might also be the same where QIntValidator's are used for UIN#
> as in authuserdlg.cpp, reqauthdlg.cpp, securitudlg.cpp.
> 
> 
> Regards,

-- 
wwp


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf