|
|
Fwd: [Standards-JIG] Avatar Image Hashes: msg#00135
network.jabber.py-transports
|
Subject: |
Fwd: [Standards-JIG] Avatar Image Hashes |
=D Since we had discussed this here before, I wanted to forward this
on.
Daniel
Begin forwarded message:
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: March 13, 2006 1:24:40 PM EST
To: Jabber protocol discussion list <standards-jig@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Standards-JIG] Avatar Image Hashes
Reply-To: Jabber protocol discussion list <standards-jig@xxxxxxxxxx>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Henninger wrote:
Hi folk!
In all three of the avatar implementation JEPs, you are told to
generate
a hash of the "image data". Until now, we have operated under the
assumption that this is a hash of the actual image data, not of the
base64-encoded image data. However, after it was brought up on our
list, it seems that this is not explicitly specified anywhere. So:
1. Are we indeed correct in thinking that it's a hash of the real
image
data, not the base64 encoded data?
Correct.
2. May I request that JEP-0008, JEP-0084, and JEP-0153 all receive
minor
updates to clarify this?
Done. (I'm slow but thorough.)
P
- --
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEFbjoNF1RSzyt3NURAsiXAJ9VhrKXX718GHbba87eeW2iWFOLpACfQYLK
sVqnk1W7D0cfBURylfalL4c=
=e+2u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|