|
Re: Stable/Unstable and CVS: msg#00800network.instant-messaging.amsn.devel
I already worked with subversion and didn't see much of a difference (apart from 'snapshot' revisioning instead of file revisioning).. I did understand though from what people said, that it is better (tried it almost 3 years from now and it was a bit unstable at that point though.. i'm sure it's better now). Since I don't see a huge difference in cvs/svn, I mean difference as in 'a month of training for all devels just to be able to use svn correctly without screwing up everything', I say go for it. Question is : SF gives svn support.. but is it official full support or was it "we're trying to get svn working, can people use it and see if we set it up correctly".. I wouldn't want them to be still trying to set it up and we end up with loosing all commits done on SVN... (are the 2 synced or do we drop cvs completly when we switch to svn ?) in any case, let's just make sure svn is fully supported by SF, and let's do the switch! KaKaRoTo On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 21:13:42 -0500, GrdScarabe <grdscarabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- -- KaKaRoTo ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Stable/Unstable and CVS: 00800, GrdScarabe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Stable/Unstable and CVS: 00800, Youness Alaoui |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Stable/Unstable and CVSi: 00800, GrdScarabe |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Stable/Unstable and CVS: 00800, GrdScarabe |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |