Re: forwarding table overflow

Davide Ferrari wrote:
> El Viernes, 1 de Diciembre de 2006 17:31, Simon Kelley escribió:
>> This is a sort-of-FAQ, but it's worth getting an explanation in one
>> place which is up to date, as things have changed recently.
> 
> Thanks for the detailed explanation! :)
> So I can assume that this error was due to a not responding (at least enough 
> quickly) upstream nameserver, cannot I? I do have *lots* of DNS queries on 
> this dnsmasq.

Yes. If it's an ongoing problem, the best solution is to upgrade to
version 2.35 and increase --dns-forward-max from the default 150.

> 
> Thanks again.
> (and thanks as well for the great program dnsmasq is!)

My pleasure.


Cheers,

Simon.

>