> Yes this machine is also running DHCP. This machine is running RedHat
> 8.0. It is acting as main DNS and DHCP server. So is it possible that
> the DHCP server is trying to do the updates?
Yes.
> I did not intentionally set up dhcp to do updates on behalf of the
> clients. But it might be. What should I look for in the DHCP configs?
I suggest that you read the manual pages for your DHCP server.
Note it helps to tell us what you are running. There is more
than one DHCP server implementation.
> Any suggestions?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: marka@xxxxxxx [mailto:marka@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Mark.Andrews@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 5:53 PM
> To: Jim Wininger
> Cc: bind9-users@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:
>
>
>
> > I am running bind 9.2.1 I have looked through the archives and found
> > many messages refering to the Win2k issues and the update denied log
> > message. What I am seeing in the log file is the exact same thing.
> > However what I am seeing is the client address is the address of the
> > Bind server.
> >
> > So it would seem that there is a Win2k box on the network that is
> > using the same ip as this server, or is there somehting else going on?
>
> Does the machine also run a dhcp server and did you configure
> it to do updates on behalf of the clients?
>
> Do you have anti spoofing packet filters installed?
>
> Someone may have just run nsupdate on the machine.
>
> > --snip--
> > Jun 22 04:06:04 dom-name named[27633]: client 1.2.3.4#1551: update
> > 'domain.name/IN' denied
> > --snip--
> >
> > Where 1.2.3.4 IS the ip of this bind server.
> >
> > --
> > Jim Wininger
> >
> > --
> > Linux - Because rebooting is for adding new hardware.
> > --
> >
> >
> --
> Mark Andrews, Internet Software Consortium
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews@xxxxxxx
>
>
--
Mark Andrews, Internet Software Consortium
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews@xxxxxxx
|
