Evening,
yes, you would be able to archive this by using "split-views".
There are though some diffrent type of setups that you could consider =
using, but I'm thinking you could find this useful; =
http://www.cymru.com/Documents/secure-bind-template.html
Regards,
Tobias Lindgren
Song Networks AB (Sweden)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Murphy [mailto:richard@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: den 29 november 2002 17:06
> To: bind9-users@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Using bind 9 Adaptively (Is spilt DNS the answer)
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Evening all
>=20
> I am looking to implement an internal DNS system that will=20
> respond with
> a record that is specific to the users network. Let me explain. I am
> looking to implement a number of caching engines out to over=20
> 300 remote
> sites that are part of a large private (network 10) WAN. =20
> Presently all
> hosts on the network are configured to look to a specific=20
> caching engine
> cluster using RR -DNS with the host address, lets say, host.domain.com
> (in laymen's terms all Internet browsers on the network are configured
> to use host.domain.com as there proxy). To avoid having the burden of
> having to change all remote clients browsers to accommodate=20
> the roll out
> of caching engines to the remote sites, I wish to implement a DNS
> resolution system that will therefore give a response to a request for
> host.domain.com as the local caching engine on site rather than the
> caching engines on the core of out network. Make sense?
>=20
> To provide an example, if I was on the network 10.1.1.1/255.255.255.0
> and my new caching engine had the address 10.1.1.30, then my=20
> DNS (on the
> core of the network serving all sites) would intelligently respond to
> all clients on the network 10.1.1.1/255.255.255.0 who requested
> host.domain.com with the address 10.1.1.30. Likewise, if I was on the
> network 10.1.2.0/255.255.255.0 and my new caching engine was 10.1.2.30
> then the DNS would respond for me with that address.
>=20
> I've briefly looked at the functionality that Bind9 provides=20
> with regard
> to split DNS and views (External and Internal responses) but the
> documentation is not clear that this can achieve what I want so does
> anyone have any experience in getting this working to the sort of
> solution I am looking for?
>=20
> I am currently running Bind 8.2.2 on RH7.0 as an internal DNS=20
> system but
> would be *very keen* to upgrade to 9 should it provide me with this
> functionality.
>=20
> TIA
>=20
> Richard Murphy
> BGfL Internetworking Manager (UK)
>=20
>=20
>=20
> *************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
> and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity=20
> to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email=20
> in error please notify postmaster@xxxxxxxx
>=20
> The views expressed within this email are those of the=20
> individual, and not necessarily those of the organisation
> *************************************************************
>=20
>=20
>=20
|
