|
Re: SOA records: msg#00658network.dns.bind.user
In article <bb5nfp$20v8$1@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Dibyendu Rakshit (Dib) <drakshit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >BIND users, >Does SOA need to point to a primary name server? Does it need to point to a >existing name server at all? > >What is the relevance of SOA when NS records are present? The MNAME field in the SOA record is supposed to be the primary master server, which may or may not be in the NS records. The NS records tell other nameservers where to send queries for that zone, the SOA MNAME field tells humans where the primary master server is. It's also used by some dynamic DNS clients to know where to send updates to. -- Barry Margolin, barry.margolin@xxxxxxxxxx Level(3), Woburn, MA *** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups. Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | over-use of allow-transfer ?: 00658, Beeblebrox |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Trouble with incomplete additional section data: 00658, Kevin Darcy |
| Previous by Thread: | SOA recordsi: 00658, Dibyendu Rakshit (Dib) |
| Next by Thread: | over-use of allow-transfer ?: 00658, Beeblebrox |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |