|
Re: failover resolution: msg#00582network.dns.bind.user
In article <bb05r1$1fpn$1@xxxxxxxxxxx>, zeb <thierry.constant1.nospam@xxxxxxx> wrote: >Hi, > >Is it possible, with NDS, to have, something like a failover for the name >resolution >i.e. >NAME1 @IP1 >NAME2 @IP2 >NAME3 @IP3 >and >alias NAME which is NAME1, > or NAME2 if NAME1 not responding > or NAME3 if NAME1 and NAME1 not responding > etc... >or any product which can do that ? BIND can't do this. Look into 3DNS or Cisco Distributed Director. -- Barry Margolin, barry.margolin@xxxxxxxxxx Level(3), Woburn, MA *** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups. Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | (unknown): 00582, Samantha Gilster |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: curious name resolution problems: 00582, Barry Margolin |
| Previous by Thread: | failover resolutioni: 00582, zeb |
| Next by Thread: | Round-robin mail & DNS question: 00582, Alan Murrell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |