Hi All,
So, can I say "Our all '030s get panic at reboot in NetBSD-3.1,
How about IIci ?
Does anyone know "my '030 can reboot without panic" ?
and, it's only in '030s, all '040 works fine at reboot." ?
I dislike to see that panicked (MMU fault) screen. It makes me
panic, too.
On 2006/11/16, at 1:59, Bjarne Bäckström wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 I wrote:
[...]
"reboot" makes the computer crash and break into the debugger
with an "MMU fault" message. "shutdown" works okay, though.
[...]
On 2006/11/16, at 3:34, Hauke Fath wrote:
(kazu:)
2) All my 030s get panic at reboot, includeing SE/30, and also
SE/40 (SE/30 + 040 accelerator / GENERIC).
...'panic at reboot' appeared sometimes in 1.6z(?) on 030s,
Not really. I've got a Mac IIsi here that neither panicked with NetBSD
2.1_STABLE, nor with a 4.99.3 kernel.
It's interesting, though, that when you bring down the machine with
'shutdown -h now', the panic occurs after you hit the "any" key to
reboot.
Yes, thanks to Bjarne and Hauke.
To avoid that, I do 'shutdown -h now' then push Reset or Power-off,
but ... it's not 'graceful'. ;)
On 2006/11/16, at 1:59, Bjarne Bäckström wrote:
I had to boot with extensions off, though.
--
Yes, that's a good idea, too.
NetBSD reads PRAM. When PRAM has correct setting, we don't need
INIT nor CDEV in MacOS, right?
How about 32-bit dirty machines ? IIx, IIcx or SE/30 for example,
we need MODE32 and Memory Control Panel in MacOS.
IIsi is 32-bit clean, a beautifu and interesting machine, I like
IIsi, too.
(again)
On 2006/11/16, at 3:34, Hauke Fath wrote:
I've got a Mac IIsi here that neither panicked with NetBSD
2.1_STABLE, nor with a 4.99.3 kernel.
Very interesting. I'm expecting the next of NetBSD/mac68k.
Regards,
Kazu Inanaga
|
