logo       

Re: how's 3.1?: msg#00029

Subject: Re: how's 3.1?

On 2006/11/12, at 9:13, Hauke Fath wrote:

At 19:35 Uhr +0100 11.11.2006, Marco Trillo wrote:
By the way, how does 4.99.3 run on mac68k ? What about the GCC4 speed ?

It runs.  :)

I have a Quadra 650 set up with -current, since I am working on the
timecounter MD bits. The machine has built a few kernels without problems,
but I haven't timed gcc4 yet.

Hi,

Just my impression:
4.99.3 runs nicely on my Quadra800. Honestly, I don't use it so much.
Using Gimp sometimes, and mainly it does cvs update and making kernels.

4.99.3 is OK for such faster 040 which has plenty of Ram.



What about the GCC4 speed ?


Please teach me, to use GCC4, "HAVE_GCC=4" in /etc/mk.conf ?
Do I need it in 4.99.3 ? Without it means GCC3 ?
If YES, I have a data about speed.

Quadra800: (139MB/44Mhz): 4.99.3: source -current
build.sh tools
GCC3?   12 hours 56 min.
GCC4    12 hours 42 min.        

build.sh kernel (My conf, not GENERIC)
GCC3?   6 hours 25 min.
GCC4    6 hours 41 min. 

There is no difference.
So, I guess GCC4 runs by default in 4.99.3, wrong ?

LC630: (Full040/53MB/40MHz/IDE): 3.1.0_P: source -rnetbsd-3-1
build.sh tools
GCC3    10 hours 31 min.

I was wondering, "Why LC630 is faster than Quadra800 ??"
I think I get the answer.. NO ? :)

Thanks,
Kazu Inanaga







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>