logo       

Re: how's 3.1?: msg#00008

Subject: Re: how's 3.1?
On 2006/11/12, at 1:55, Marco Trillo wrote:


Hi,

On 11/11/06, Kazuyuki Inanaga <happyday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

1) ColorX (Xmac68k_color.bz2) is OK on NetBSD-3.1 binary sets.
        test machine: LC475(16 bpp), Quadra700(8 bbp)

LC475: startx >& startx.log

 >Couldn't open RGB_DB '/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb'
 >This is not a fatal error.
 [...]
 >twm:  invalid color name "black"
 >twm:  invalid color name "white"
 >(snip)
[...]
 >Xlib:  extension "RENDER" missing on display ":0.0".

  These all are not fatal errors. :)


Are you using the Xmac68k_color with the X11 sets from the NetBSD
1.6.x release or from the NetBSD 3.1 sets ?

Try unpacking the X distribution from the NetBSD 1.6.2 release to be
used by the Xmac68k_color server.



Hi,
 Thanks for your advice.
I'm using the Xmac68k_color with the X11 sets from the NetBSD 3.1 sets.

 My plan is, after making WindowMaker, I'll put 16 bpp color Nubus card
on Quadra700. I expect some of those errors will disappear with
WindowMaker except "SecurityPolicy". I know nothing about that.
I don't remember if I saw that in 1.6x. Is that new in NetBSD-3?

Regards,
Kazu Inanaga




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>