logo       

Re: how's 3.1?: msg#00006

Subject: Re: how's 3.1?

On 2006/11/10, at 12:38, Tim & Alethea Larson wrote:

Anyone using 3.1 that would care to comment on how it's going so far?


Hi,
 I'm going to install 3.1 on several Macs. Just a quick response.


1) ColorX (Xmac68k_color.bz2) is OK on NetBSD-3.1 binary sets.
        test machine: LC475(16 bpp), Quadra700(8 bbp)

LC475: startx >& startx.log

>Couldn't open RGB_DB '/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb'
>This is not a fatal error.

>Couldn't set video mode to desired depth.
>I gather there is no video ROM driver present for this display.
>Screen 0 at 0x4255000, 560 by 384, 16 bpp, rowB 1152, fbbase 0xb94000.

>error opening security policy file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver/ SecurityPolicy

>twm:  invalid color name "black"
>twm:  invalid color name "white"
>(snip)

>Xlib:  extension "RENDER" missing on display ":0.0".

 These all are not fatal errors. :)
'startx' on LC475(full 040/40Mhz/36MB)  takes 45 seconds to complete.
Is this slow?
Quadra700 is now making "WindowMaker" and "links-gui" from source.
Almost 20 hours past, no error, but slow...



2) 3.1 Sysinst(netbsd-INSTALLSBC.gz) does not work for FPU-less 030s.
        test machine: LCIII, Duo230

At 'newfs' in Sysinst method:
>Command ended on signal
>/sbin/newfs -O 1 -b 8192 -f 1024 /dev/rsd0a


At Utility Menu:
># newfs /dev/rsd0a
> uid 0, pid 18, command newfs, on /: file system full

This is a fatal error.

Thanks,
Kazu Inanaga




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>