|
Questions about Cage's mesostics: msg#00022music.john-cage
Hello there, I'm at the moment writing about a couple of John Cage's mesostics, and a bunch of questions have surfaced. In the booklet that comes with the CD "Litany for the Whale", it says about "36 Mesostics Re and Not Re Marcel Duchamp" that Cage gave 15 of them melodies "in the same three-note style as 'The Wonderful Widow of Eighteen Springs,'" and also that these "were published in 'Songbooks' as 'Solo for Voice 91, Song with Electronics-Irrelevant'." And on page 179 in James Pritchett's "The Music of John Cage", the following is written: "In Solo 91, fifteen of the '26 Mesostics Re and not Re Marcel Duchamp' are set using a simple four-note collection of pitches, the result being quite similar to 'The Wonderful Widow of Eighteen Springs'." (It says "26 Mesostics ..." in the Index as well.) There are two questions here: The mesostics printed in the booklet of "Litany for the Whale" are identical to the ones printed in "M: Writings '67-'72", and there are clearly 36 of them. Has a small mistake been made in "The Music of John Cage", or is there another set of Duchamp mesostics, with 26 poems? And have the mesostics been "musicalized" with three- or four-note pitch collections? (I wish I could determine this with my own ears, but I don't really trust them.) The other questions are about the visual structure of the mesostics: Did Cage ever explicitly talk about or mention the fact that the visual element of his mesostics disappeared when they were presented orally (by speech or song)? In the foreword to "I-VI", he writes that the mesostics were "written to be read aloud", yet they were written and published without abandoning the horizontal/vertical relationship between the letters, a relationship that is nowhere to be found when the text is read aloud. Cage doesn't come across as one who would fail to notice an issue such as this one, so I'm sure that he was aware of the "potential problem" - but was he concerned about it? I mean, the visual element appears to have been very important to him, or else, "I-VI" would not have had to be published in the shape it was... do you think that the answer might be found in his statement that "composing's one thing, performing's another, listening's a third. What can they have to do with one another?" In the case of the "62 Mesostics Re Merce Cunningham", a couple of the letters are designed in such a way that they float into one another and create new shapes that no longer resemble letters. Occasionally, one letter has a design which covers other letters, making them invisible. Here, I think that the visual element is so dominant that the verbal element is diminished (or at least altered). I'm sure Cage also noticed this, but was he concerned about it? What was his feelings? Is there in his use of chance operations an immanent acceptance of the results, even if a part of the work gets overshadowed in the process? (Perhaps a relevant parallel can be drawn to musical works such as "Thirteen", in which Cage's permitting some sounds to be loud at the same time permits them to, if not totally drown out, then at least diminish the presence of sounds of a smaller amplitude.) In short, what I wonder is if Cage ever wrote or talked about these issues, or if one, in order to find out what he felt about them, rather should search in his thoughts about his music (and perhaps his visual art). I would also be grateful if it could be pointed out to me which books or essays or articles it would be useful to read. One last question: did Cage ever refer to his work (the writings with visual elements) as "visual poetry"? Or did he use another term? I am sure that any and all comments on these questions will be of interest to me, and I will be thankful for everything you write. Also, if anything is unclear about what I ask about, then please let me know. And I apologize if some of the above has the tone of a completely clueless beginner trying to say something smart; while it in many ways is correct, I must point out that it is not my goal. Thank you so much in advance. -- Björn Magnusson Höstrusk och grå moln - köp en resa till solen på Yahoo! Resor på adressen http://se.docs.yahoo.com/travel/index.html |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Ne(x)tworks May 28: 00022, Cornelius Dufallo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Questions about Cage's mesostics: 00022, Rob Haskins |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Ne(x)tworks May 23i: 00022, davidi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Questions about Cage's mesostics: 00022, Rob Haskins |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |