|
Re: Re: More ReplayGain questions - sorry...: msg#00266music.equipment.slimdevices.ripping
--- Stan Pulsar <Stan.Pulsar.2kmzcz1169174701-NUepA2SMhDQqspMVqqL2D+4xXEVPTSb/VpNB7YpNyf8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Josh Coalson;171732 Wrote: > > FLAC's replaygain support is just a tag. it is not altering the > > stream in any way like mp3gain does for mp3. with FLAC it is up to > > the player to interpret the tag and alter the level. > > Is that not also true for mp3 files being only tagged with analysis > values, the gain not being 'applied' ? I think so, but best to test. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss an email again! Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: ID3v2.3 genres: 00266, studley |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Hendrix, Jimi or Jimi Hendrix?: 00266, Havoc |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: More ReplayGain questions - sorry...i: 00266, Stan Pulsar |
| Next by Thread: | Hendrix, Jimi or Jimi Hendrix?: 00266, Rick B . |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |