|
Re: Artwork for flac?: msg#00301music.equipment.slimdevices.ripping
I don't see any special FLACTAG application frame here: http://flac.sourceforge.net/id.html And the Vorbis Comments specification (FLAC comments are Vorbis comments) says quite clearly: "It should be a little information to remember the disc by and explain it to others; a short, to-the-point text note that need not only be a couple words, but isn't going to be more than a short paragraph." So a base64 encoded image in VORBIS_COMMENT seems to be kind of violating the standard, vs. the official PICTURE frame ;) -- CCRDude ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CCRDude's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8478 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=30928 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Pros and cons between WMA Lossless vs FLAC: 00301, Pat Farrell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Pros and cons between WMA Lossless vs FLAC: 00301, Phil Meyer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Artwork for flac?i: 00301, Andy Hawkins |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Artwork for flac?: 00301, Andy Hawkins |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |