Re: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vorbis confusion

De:     Luca Barbato <lu_zero@xxxxxxxxxx>

> > Yeah - but what is a "dummy"
> > comment header? This is not defined
> > in the I-D nor the Vorbis spec.

> The vorbis spec defines the minimal
> header accepted. A sender could put
> there a string like "Program - Version"
> or just "".

> "an empty one" "a different one" "a
> smaller one" would sound better?

A minimal valid Vorbis comments header or anything that makes it clear that it 
MUST be a syntactically valid header.

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt