Re: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vorbis confusion

Remi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> De:   Luca Barbato <lu_zero@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
>>> Yeah - but what is a "dummy"
>>> comment header? This is not defined
>>> in the I-D nor the Vorbis spec.
> 
>> The vorbis spec defines the minimal
>> header accepted. A sender could put
>> there a string like "Program - Version"
>> or just "".
> 
>> "an empty one" "a different one" "a
>> smaller one" would sound better?
> 
> A minimal valid Vorbis comments header or anything that makes it clear
> that it MUST be a syntactically valid header.

...


-- 

Luca Barbato
Gentoo Council Member
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt