|
Re: restart failed: msg#00017monitoring.monit.general
On 17. jul. 2005, at 10.03, Pavel Urban wrote: Hello, Yes, if it didn't work the first time it is assumed that it wont work (in this cycle). I think this is okay.. BUT - no timeout occures and therefore no 'timeout' notifications are sent, while the service is effectively not running. Can this be accomplished somehow? Well, timeout occurs only in the reverse situation - if monit failed to start the service in x out of y cycles. In this case monit failed to stop. However if you put this at the top of your monitrc file, "set alert foo@bar", or "alert foo@bar [on {exec}]" in the check process entry you _will_ at least get an alert message if monit failed to execute the stop-program or start-program. -- Jan-Henrik Haukeland Mobil +47 97141255
To unsubscribe: http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Port Sensitivity Test too??: 00017, Martin Pala |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Logfile matching: 00017, Christian Hopp |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: monit unresponsive to status requests?i: 00017, Jan-Henrik Haukeland |
| Next by Thread: | Re: restart failed: 00017, Martin Pala |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |