|
RE: Problems with vi Hanging: msg#00331misc.nslu2.linux
From: Jim Tucker [mailto:rjtucker-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] >Is it possible to install a more robust version of vi? vim is a bitbake package, but I haven't tried building it. busybox vi is neither vim nor vi, it has the advantage of being a single (albeit 4000 line) c file. The problem may be that the particular set of configuration options selected, I notice that the default build has "CONFIG_FEATURE_VI_DOT_CMD" turned off, so presumably whoever selected the features is not a vi user... I also notice that the SIGWINCH handling is built in, along with OPTIMIZE_CURSOR. I just turned *all* the features on, and since I have done that I haven't noticed any problems, well, apart from the traditional uncertainty in the differences between "majjj>`a" and "majjjl>`a" but that's a vile/vim thing. [BTW I didn't turn on anything not in the busybox configuration file - i.e. I just hacked the config of busybox by 'make menuconfig', I certainly didn't turn on *or* off CONFIG_FEATURE_VI_CRASHME.] John Bowler <jbowler-HInyCGIudOg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [ Moderator Note: All static information is slowly moving to the Wiki at http://www.nslu2-linux.org ] |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Problems with vi Hanging: 00331, Jim Tucker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | byRequest patch for TiVo To Go (ver 7.1): 00331, Ray Manalang |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Problems with vi Hangingi: 00331, Jim Tucker |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Problems with vi Hanging: 00331, Jim Tucker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |