Subject: Re: spf_lib_version.h - msg#00100

Previous Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: From debian-devel: ITA/RFS: libspf2 ...

On Friday 23 March 2007 20:59, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Thats' great news. > > In your changelog it does not look to me like you included the patch for > RFC compliant processing limits: > > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libspf2/+bug/92569 > > If you didn't, I'd appreciate it if you would include that so I can just > synch your version from Debian into Ubuntu rather than having to merge > them. If you need a bug in BTS, let me know and I'll file it. OK. No, I didn't, but I have included it now. -- Magnus Holmgren holmgren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks) ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=1007 pgpUAz5E2K5v6.pgp Description: PGP signature

Next Message by Date: click to view message preview

That amd64 segfault again

I thought I should attach the patch I'm about to apply to libspf2 in Debian. I started with the patch posted by Thomas Jacob to the Debian bug report (http://bugs.debian.org/392793) and merged with the one from Herbert Straub. Then I moved the changes that just cast the arguments to SPF_Infof() and SPF_Debugf() into a separate patch and instead changed the format strings. But how portable is the z flag to printf()? (From the manpage: "A following integer conversion corresponds to a size_t or ssize_t argument."). -- Magnus Holmgren holmgren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks) ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=1007 20_64bit_types.dpatch Description: Text Data 20_printf_types.dpatch Description: Text Data pgp3n7X3nZXe3.pgp Description: PGP signature

Previous Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Re: spf_lib_version.h

On Friday 23 March 2007 08:23, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > First, let me introduce myself. I'm a wannabe Debian Developer and also a > contributor to the Exim MTA. My Debian "portfolio": > http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=magnus@xxxxxxxxxxx > > Since Eric Dorland has orphaned libspf2 in Debian, I was thinking that I > could take care of it instead. It fits with the other anti-spam packages I > maintain (or is trying to get a sponsor for). > > Now to the issue: The tarball includes src/include/spf_lib_version.h (which > says that the version is 1.2.1, which it wrong), and configure also > generates src/libspf2/spf_lib_version.h, which isn't removed by the > distclean target. What gives? I haven't figured out which file is actually > included by the source files not in src/libspf2 yet. I think that would be great. I have been doing some downstream work in Ubuntu because I was the SPF guy that was packaging stuff for Ubuntu. When it comes to C programs, my knowledge is very minimal and I, for one, would be grateful to have someone upstream in Debian maintaining the package. I do know from working with building the package that the clean rules aren't getting the job done (building in pbuilder has worked best for me). Here are the changes I've made in Ubuntu that will be in the next release and that I'd recommend for Debian (Debian BTS url is also supplied if I have it): https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libspf2/+bug/79683 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=306875 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libspf2/+bug/65952 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=392793 Note that the debian/rules file in this patch does not have the changes for the update-alterative changes in 306875, so the debian/rules changes for these two fixes have to be merged. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libspf2/+bug/92569 This one is not in BTS yet. Scott K ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=1007

Next Message by Thread: click to view message preview

From debian-devel: ITA/RFS: libspf2 ...

retitle 372629 ITA: libspf2 -- Sender Policy Framework library, written in C owner 372629 magnus@xxxxxxxxxxx thanks I have created a new version of libspf2 and intend to adopt it if I can find a sponsor (and/or co-maintainer). It fixes (hopefully) all outstanding bugs except one. 20_64bit_types.patch may need some testing. I hope that some DD is interested enough in SPF to take the time, and that he or she will find the package satisfactory. The dsc, for download with e.g. dget, is at ftp://ftp.kibibyte.se/debian/pool/main/libs/libspf2/libspf2_1.2.5.dfsg-1.dsc Description: Sender Policy Framework library, written in C libspf2 implements the Sender Policy Framework, a part of the SPF/SRS protocol pair. libspf2 is a library which allows email systems such as Sendmail, Postfix, Exim, Zmailer and MS Exchange to check SPF records and make sure that the email is authorized by the domain name that it is coming from. This prevents email forgery, commonly used by spammers, scammers and email viruses/worms. Homepage: http://www.libspf2.org/ License: GPL/BSD Changelog entry: * New maintainer (Closes: #372629). * Repacked .orig.tar.gz without non-free (and obsolete) IETF Internet Draft (Closes: #393390). * Merge updates from Ubuntu: - Add debian/compat and Build-depend on debhelper >= 5. - Add alternatives handling for /usr/bin/spfquery (Closes: #306875). - Conflict on libmail-spf-query-perl << 1:1.999.1-3. - Add postinst and prerm scripts. - debian/copyright: update author address. - debian/control: add final newline. * debian/control: * Change description of spfquery (Closes: #410592). * Add homepage to package descriptions. * Reduce Debian diff by changing line endings with sed instead. * Further reduce Debian diff by eliminating config.sub and config.guess from there. Build-depend on autotools-dev to ensure up-to-date versions instead. * The autogenerated spf_lib_version.h was put in the wrong directory, while there was a static spf_lib_version.h in the right directory. Fix that with some rules in debian/rules. * Use simple-patchsys.mk to manage patches. * Apply 20_64bit_types.patch to hopefully prevent segfaults on 64-bit architectures (Closes: #392793). Thanks to Thomas Jacob, Carsten Koch-Mauthe and Herbert Straub. * debian/watch: added. * Update Standards-Version to 3.7.2 without changes. * Apply 20_spf_dns_include_std_headers.patch: Include arpa/nameser.h and netdb.h from spf_dns.h instead of defining the constants needed unless certain HAVE_ macros are defined (Closes: #405885). -- Magnus Holmgren holmgren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks) ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=1007 pgpQKFui1LWqf.pgp Description: PGP signature