mail.spam.spf.devel (date)

mail.spam.spf.devel (date)

November 30, 2006

How ip4:/ip6: _should_ have been handled (was: Updated anti-BOTH AND argument list), Julian Mehnle
Re: Updated anti-BOTH AND argument list, Julian Mehnle
Re: Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, wayne
Re: Re: Updated anti-BOTH AND argument list, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Julian Mehnle
Re: Re: Updated anti-BOTH AND argument list, wayne
Re: Re: Updated anti-BOTH AND argument list, Boyd Lynn Gerber
Re: Updated anti-BOTH AND argument list, Julian Mehnle
Re: Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Scott Kitterman
Re: Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Julian Mehnle
Re: Updated anti-BOTH AND argument list, Julian Mehnle

November 29, 2006

Re: Re: Updated anti-BOTH AND argument list, wayne
Re: Updated anti-BOTH AND argument list, Frank Ellermann
Re: Re: Updated anti-BOTH AND argument list, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Re: Updated anti-BOTH AND argument list, wayne
Re: Updated anti-BOTH AND argument list, Frank Ellermann
RE: Re: Mail::SPF pre-release -- please review and test!, Mark
Re: Re: Mail::SPF pre-release -- please review and test!, Scott Kitterman
Re: Mail::SPF pre-release -- please review and test!, Julian Mehnle
Re: Re: Mail::SPF pre-release -- please review and test!, Scott Kitterman
RE: Re: Mail::SPF pre-release -- please review and test!, Mark
Re: RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Mail::SPF pre-release -- please review and test!, Scott Kitterman
Re: Mail::SPF pre-release -- please review and test!, Julian Mehnle
RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Mail::SPF pre-release -- please review and test!, Mark

November 28, 2006

Re: Mail::SPF pre-release -- please review and test!, Julian Mehnle
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Julian Mehnle
Re: Updated anti-BOTH AND argument list, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Frank Ellermann
Re: New poll on the IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, wayne
Re: New poll on the IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, william(at)elan.net
Updated anti-BOTH AND argument list, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: New poll on the IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: New poll on the IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: New poll on the IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, william(at)elan.net
Re: New poll on the IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, william(at)elan.net
Re: New poll on the IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, wayne
Re: New poll on the IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, wayne
Re: New poll on the IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: New poll on the IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: New poll on the IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, william(at)elan.net
Re: New poll on the IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Mail::SPF pre-release -- please review and test!, Julian Mehnle
New poll on the IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, wayne
RE: Re: Mail::SPF pre-release -- please review and test!, Mark
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Mail::SPF pre-release -- please review and test!, Julian Mehnle
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy backbone.schlitt.net GREYLIST_ISWHITE autolearn=ham version=3.0.4, Scott Kitterman
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Julian Mehnle
RE: Mail::SPF pre-release -- please review and test!, Mark
Re: Mail::SPF pre-release -- please review and test!, Julian Mehnle
RE: Mail::SPF pre-release -- please review and test!, Mark
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, wayne
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Boyd Lynn Gerber
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Scott Kitterman
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Frank Ellermann
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Mail::SPF pre-release -- please review and test!, John A. Martin
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, wayne
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Julian Mehnle

November 27, 2006

RE: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Mark
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, wayne
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Mail::SPF pre-release -- please review and test!, Julian Mehnle
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, wayne
Mail::SPF pre-release -- please review and test!, Julian Mehnle
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Scott Kitterman
Re: Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, wayne
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, wayne
Re: Test suite 2006.11, Julian Mehnle
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Scott Kitterman
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Julian Mehnle
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Julian Mehnle
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, wayne
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Stuart D. Gathman
IP4 mapped IP6 connection controversy, Stuart D. Gathman
Test suite 2006-11, Stuart D. Gathman

November 17, 2006

November 16, 2006

The SPF spec is now rfc4408, not draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle

November 15, 2006

Re: Re: HELLO macro and PTR, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: HELLO macro and PTR, Julian Mehnle
Re: Re: HELLO macro and PTR, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Re: A permanent TempError, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Re: HELLO macro and PTR, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Test suite v1.0 ?, Julian Mehnle
Re: Test suite v1.0 ?, Frank Ellermann
Re: HELLO macro and PTR, Frank Ellermann
MSAs' role as a shield for recipient MTAs against garbage HELOs (was: HELLO macro and PTR), Julian Mehnle
Re: Test suite v1.0 ?, Julian Mehnle
Re: Re: HELLO macro and PTR, Arthur Kahlich
Re: Calling RFC lawyers: DNS limits, Julian Mehnle
Re: A permanent TempError, Julian Mehnle
Re: HELLO macro and PTR, Julian Mehnle
Re: SPF3 wish list, Julian Mehnle
Re: HELLO macro and PTR, Julian Mehnle

News | FAQ | advertise