mail.spam.spf.devel (thread)

p-macro tests for test-suite, Stuart D. Gathman
XML test suite (was: The next meeting: Sat 2006-10-07 16:00 UTC?), Frank Ellermann
Calling RFC lawyers: macro syntax error in unknown modifier, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Calling RFC lawyers: macro syntax error in unknown modifier, Scott Kitterman
- Re: Calling RFC lawyers: macro syntax error in unknown modifier, wayne
  - Re: Calling RFC lawyers: macro syntax error in unknown modifier, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Calling RFC lawyers: macro syntax error in unknown modifier, Julian Mehnle
- Re: Calling RFC lawyers: macro syntax error in unknown modifier, Frank Ellermann
Incorrect test "longlabel", Norman Maurer
- Re: Incorrect test "longlabel", Norman Maurer
  - Re: Incorrect test "longlabel", Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: Incorrect test "longlabel", Stuart D. Gathman
Test Suite Issue, Scott Kitterman
- Re: Test Suite Issue, Julian Mehnle
- Re: Test Suite Issue, Stuart D. Gathman
  - Re: Test Suite Issue, Scott Kitterman
    - Re: Test Suite Issue, Stuart D. Gathman
    - Re: Test Suite Issue, Scott Kitterman
    - Re: Test Suite Issue, Stuart D. Gathman
    - Re: Test Suite Issue, Scott Kitterman
    - Re: Test Suite Issue - Resolved (not test suite issue), Scott Kitterman
- Re: Re: Test Suite Issue, Scott Kitterman
jSPF-0.9b3 was released, Norman Maurer
Interesting permerror, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Interesting permerror, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: Re: Interesting permerror, Craig Whitmore
Re: repeated all mechanism, Scott Kitterman
- Re: repeated all mechanism, Stuart D. Gathman
  - Re: repeated all mechanism, Scott Kitterman
- Re: repeated all mechanism, Scott Kitterman
  - Re: repeated all mechanism, Stuart D. Gathman
    - Re: repeated all mechanism, Scott Kitterman
    - Re: repeated all mechanism, Scott Kitterman
Revised mx-limit and ptr-limit tests, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Scott Kitterman
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Julian Mehnle
  - Issue tracker (was: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC), Frank Ellermann
  - Issue tracker for 4408bis, wayne
    - Re: Issue tracker for 4408bis, wayne
    - Re: Issue tracker for 4408bis, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: Issue tracker for 4408bis, Philip Gladstone
    - Re: Re: Issue tracker for 4408bis, Stuart D. Gathman
    - Re: Issue tracker for 4408bis, Frank Ellermann
    - Design bugs in v=spf1 (was: Issue tracker for 4408bis), Julian Mehnle
    - Re: Design bugs in v=spf1 (was: Issue tracker for 4408bis), Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Frank Ellermann
Re: "-all." trailing point error?, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Re: "-all." trailing point error?, Stuart D. Gathman
- repeated all mechanism, Stuart D. Gathman
  - Re: repeated all mechanism, Julian Mehnle
Re: Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Scott Kitterman
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Julian Mehnle
    - Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Julian Mehnle
  - Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Julian Mehnle
    - Re: Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, wayne
    - Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Julian Mehnle
    - Re: Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, wayne
- Re: Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Scott Kitterman
Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, wayne
  - Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Stuart D. Gathman
    - Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, wayne
    - Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Julian Mehnle
    - Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Stuart D. Gathman
  - Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Stuart D. Gathman
    - Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, wayne
    - Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Julian Mehnle
    - Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, wayne
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Scott Kitterman
test-suite, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Jeroen Massar
  - Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Julian Mehnle
- Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Stuart D. Gathman
  - Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, wayne
    - Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Stuart D. Gathman
    - Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Stuart D. Gathman
    - Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, wayne
    - Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Stuart D. Gathman
    - Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, wayne
    - Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Stuart D. Gathman
    - Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, wayne
    - Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Julian Mehnle