mail.spam.spf.devel (date)

mail.spam.spf.devel (date)

September 30, 2006

p-macro tests for test-suite, Stuart D. Gathman
XML test suite (was: The next meeting: Sat 2006-10-07 16:00 UTC?), Frank Ellermann

September 26, 2006

Re: Test Suite Issue - Resolved (not test suite issue), Scott Kitterman
Re: Re: Incorrect test "longlabel", Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Incorrect test "longlabel", Frank Ellermann
Re: Calling RFC lawyers: macro syntax error in unknown modifier, Frank Ellermann
Re: Incorrect test "longlabel", Norman Maurer
Re: Calling RFC lawyers: macro syntax error in unknown modifier, Julian Mehnle

September 25, 2006

Re: Calling RFC lawyers: macro syntax error in unknown modifier, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Calling RFC lawyers: macro syntax error in unknown modifier, wayne
Re: Calling RFC lawyers: macro syntax error in unknown modifier, Scott Kitterman
Calling RFC lawyers: macro syntax error in unknown modifier, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Test Suite Issue, Scott Kitterman
Re: Test Suite Issue, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Test Suite Issue, Scott Kitterman
Re: Test Suite Issue, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Test Suite Issue, Scott Kitterman
Re: Test Suite Issue, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Re: Test Suite Issue, Scott Kitterman
Re: Test Suite Issue, Julian Mehnle
Incorrect test "longlabel", Norman Maurer
Test Suite Issue, Scott Kitterman

September 24, 2006

jSPF-0.9b3 was released, Norman Maurer

September 22, 2006

Re: repeated all mechanism, Scott Kitterman

September 21, 2006

Re: repeated all mechanism, Scott Kitterman
Re: repeated all mechanism, Scott Kitterman

September 19, 2006

Re: Re: Interesting permerror, Craig Whitmore
Re: Interesting permerror, Frank Ellermann
Re: Issue tracker for 4408bis, Frank Ellermann
Re: repeated all mechanism, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Design bugs in v=spf1 (was: Issue tracker for 4408bis), Stuart D. Gathman
Re: repeated all mechanism, Julian Mehnle
Interesting permerror, Stuart D. Gathman
Design bugs in v=spf1 (was: Issue tracker for 4408bis), Julian Mehnle
Re: repeated all mechanism, Scott Kitterman
Re: repeated all mechanism, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: repeated all mechanism, Scott Kitterman
Revised mx-limit and ptr-limit tests, Stuart D. Gathman
repeated all mechanism, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Re: Issue tracker for 4408bis, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Re: Issue tracker for 4408bis, Philip Gladstone
Re: Re: "-all." trailing point error?, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Issue tracker for 4408bis, Frank Ellermann
Re: Issue tracker for 4408bis, wayne
Re: Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Scott Kitterman
Re: Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, wayne
Issue tracker for 4408bis, wayne
Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Julian Mehnle
Issue tracker (was: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC), Frank Ellermann
Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Frank Ellermann
Re: Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, wayne
Re: Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, wayne
Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Julian Mehnle
Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Frank Ellermann
Re: Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Scott Kitterman
Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Julian Mehnle
Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Frank Ellermann
Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Julian Mehnle
Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Julian Mehnle
Re: "-all." trailing point error?, Frank Ellermann
Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Frank Ellermann
Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Frank Ellermann
Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Frank Ellermann
Re: Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Scott Kitterman

September 18, 2006

Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Julian Mehnle
Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Julian Mehnle
Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Julian Mehnle
Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Julian Mehnle
Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, wayne
Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, wayne
Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, wayne
Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Scott Kitterman
Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Stuart D. Gathman

September 02, 2006

Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Frank Ellermann
Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Frank Ellermann
Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, wayne

September 01, 2006

Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Stuart D. Gathman
test-suite, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Frank Ellermann
Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, wayne
Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, wayne
Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Frank Ellermann
Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, wayne
Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Frank Ellermann
Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Stuart D. Gathman
Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Jeroen Massar
Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Frank Ellermann

News | FAQ | advertise