|
|
September 25, 2006
- Re: Calling RFC lawyers: macro syntax error in unknown modifier, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Calling RFC lawyers: macro syntax error in unknown modifier, wayne
- Re: Calling RFC lawyers: macro syntax error in unknown modifier, Scott Kitterman
- Calling RFC lawyers: macro syntax error in unknown modifier, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Test Suite Issue, Scott Kitterman
- Re: Test Suite Issue, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Test Suite Issue, Scott Kitterman
- Re: Test Suite Issue, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Test Suite Issue, Scott Kitterman
- Re: Test Suite Issue, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Re: Test Suite Issue, Scott Kitterman
- Re: Test Suite Issue, Julian Mehnle
- Incorrect test "longlabel", Norman Maurer
- Test Suite Issue, Scott Kitterman
September 19, 2006
- Re: Re: Interesting permerror, Craig Whitmore
- Re: Interesting permerror, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Issue tracker for 4408bis, Frank Ellermann
- Re: repeated all mechanism, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Design bugs in v=spf1 (was: Issue tracker for 4408bis), Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: repeated all mechanism, Julian Mehnle
- Interesting permerror, Stuart D. Gathman
- Design bugs in v=spf1 (was: Issue tracker for 4408bis), Julian Mehnle
- Re: repeated all mechanism, Scott Kitterman
- Re: repeated all mechanism, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: repeated all mechanism, Scott Kitterman
- Revised mx-limit and ptr-limit tests, Stuart D. Gathman
- repeated all mechanism, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Re: Issue tracker for 4408bis, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Re: Issue tracker for 4408bis, Philip Gladstone
- Re: Re: "-all." trailing point error?, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Issue tracker for 4408bis, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Issue tracker for 4408bis, wayne
- Re: Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Scott Kitterman
- Re: Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, wayne
- Issue tracker for 4408bis, wayne
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Julian Mehnle
- Issue tracker (was: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC), Frank Ellermann
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, wayne
- Re: Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, wayne
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Julian Mehnle
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Scott Kitterman
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Julian Mehnle
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Julian Mehnle
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Julian Mehnle
- Re: "-all." trailing point error?, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Scott Kitterman
September 18, 2006
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Julian Mehnle
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Julian Mehnle
- Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Julian Mehnle
- Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Julian Mehnle
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, wayne
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, wayne
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, wayne
- Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Scott Kitterman
- Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC, Stuart D. Gathman
September 01, 2006
- Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Stuart D. Gathman
- test-suite, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, wayne
- Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, wayne
- Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, wayne
- Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Stuart D. Gathman
- Re: Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Jeroen Massar
- Re: ip6 mech with ip4 connection, Frank Ellermann
|
|