Re: EFF's response to Adam Goryachev

On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 01:58:10PM -0600, Jason Borgmann wrote:
> I have tried to get Marc to send me a copy of EFFector but he seems to
> refuse.  I wanted to see what the cf rating was on it.

Well, if I check right now, the last 4 (starting with the most recent):

mail 1.0 e=2 sig=4vSKtqmPMPqAYSwRu0TrkQrEQkMA: sig not found.
mail 1.0 e=4 sig=Crlz4n-5gQU9-rDJG3398OxySpcA: sig not found.
method 4: mail 1.0: contention part, skipping
method 4: mail 1: all non-contention parts not spam, mail not spam
mail 1 is not known spam.

mail 1.0 e=2 sig=E-3ugrwbTYB-SIVna83NI9bKlLAA: sig not found.
mail 1.0 e=4 sig=YFwlvQ-sGdVO_cRVt09FfiqQSoEA: sig not found.
method 4: mail 1.0: contention part, skipping
method 4: mail 1: all non-contention parts not spam, mail not spam
mail 1 is not known spam.

mail 1.0 e=2 sig=L5lt_Ya8DcI8zS1JAes3GS0mR8kA: sig not found.
mail 1.0 e=4 sig=zS60CQm-WTNgIyx9WAjdHSWiT5EA: Is spam: cf 28 >= min_cf 6
method 4: mail 1.0: no-contention part, spam=1
method 4: mail 1: a non-contention part was spam, mail spam
mail 1 is known spam.

mail 1.0 e=2 sig=-pBVkZKu_umFP7eCMzw63b1rny4A: sig not found.
mail 1.0 e=4 sig=GQAubIDLNV8gKp9SnFToxe_Uj_YA: sig not found.
method 4: mail 1.0: contention part, skipping
method 4: mail 1: all non-contention parts not spam, mail not spam
mail 1 is not known spam.


This of course is meaningless since it's what the cf level was when it
came in.  I can only tell you what I had for SpamAssassin matches:

RAZOR2_CHECK,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_01_10      # RAZOR2_CHECK says cf>=min_cf, so cf 
>= 6
none
none
none


So it looks like for the last 4 newsletters to me, only one was hit
by Razor when it arrived at my mail server.  Since they were received,
all have been reported to Razor, and 3 of the 4 were properly revoked.

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"... so people can't look up your skirt I guess...  Not that I wear
 one..."                     - Prof. Brown about "Modesty Skirts".

pgpLSKfR0RlEc.pgp
Description: PGP signature