|
Re: Re: Razor Censoring EFF's Newsletter: msg#00238mail.spam.razor.user
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Marc Perkel wrote: > Except that EFF is not spam. The burden of proof is on Razor. You have > to show me that is the reason it was listed. If you can't then you are > merely guessing. You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: Re: Re: Razor Censoring EFF's Newsletter: 00238, Rose, Bobby |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: EFF's response to Adam Goryachev: 00238, Samuel Checker |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: Razor Censoring EFF's Newsletteri: 00238, Santiago Vila |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Razor Censoring EFF's Newsletter: 00238, Robin Lynn Frank |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |