Re: EFF's response to Adam Goryachev

Oh, well, I am impressed:

Is he the fellow that is responsible for alt.sex.lolita, 
alt.sex.beastiality, and all
those other alt's  ?

Crap, Marc... You are being exceptionally childish.  Surely the EFF isn't
so proud of all it's accomplishments that it forgets it NEVER WROTE ONE
DAMNED LINE OF CODE...

God...  I'm going to be dropping off this list again because you 
unbelievably
obtuse....  You won't SHUTUP.  You won't ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY
for your own STUPIDITY.  You won't admit that you are getting listed
because you REFUSE to DO SOMETHING besides BITCH about it.

Please Marc, get a life.

-m-

Marc Perkel wrote:

> One of our board members - John Gillmore - (If you've heard of the 
> "alt" news groups - John started alt and is one of the founders of 
> EFF.) -
>
> John says:
>
> Our stated policy is that antispam measures' first goal should be to
> deliver every non-spam message to its destination.  A particular
> ramification of that is that if 26,000 EFFector subscribers ASKED to
> get a message, and three did not, then delivery to that 26,000 should
> NEVER be interrupted or blocked.  I.e. the same message can be "spam"
> to one person, and a desired communication to another.  A blocking
> measure which cannot tell WITH RESPECT TO A PARTICULAR RECIPIENT
> whether a message is "spam" or "desired" should never block it.
>
> Here's that micro-management demand from: Adam Goryachev:
>
> >> I therefore formally request that the EFF show the public verifiable
> >> evidence of each and every member of their newsletter having
> >> requested to be on their mailing list. If you can't demonstrate that
> >> EFF has verified every subscription address then the fault is with
> >> the EFF and it should be blacklisted by anyone and everyone, and the
> >> EFF is irresponsible. I am not interested in guesses and theories
> >> that they "might" have subscribed themselves because they entered
> >> some public knowledge data. I want to see the evidence.
>
>
> I suggest that our response to this particular demand should be a
> hearty "fuck you".
>
>     John
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Razor-users mailing list
> Razor-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf