Re: Tag human v. automated submissions> (RE: Misconceptions)

hmmmmmm .... I think that would be helpful.

Nick Arnett wrote:

> Perhaps it would be practical to provide a facility to indicate whether the
> submission is being done by a human being or an automated system and deliver
> that parameter to the users?  That would allow users to lower the relative
> weight of automated submissions, which I would imagine are the source of the
> majority of non-malicious false positives.  Of course, it would do nothing
> helpful about deliberate abuse.  This would obviously need some clear
> installation notes so that people don't set up automated scripts that end up
> looking like human submissions.
>  



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf