Re: Too many false positives...goodbye, razor

On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 01:26:05PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Nice, those numbers are quite informative Theo. Makes me think that I was 
> right to set my min_cf to 11, effectively eliminating the noise present in 
> range_01_10, which seems to have a pretty bad S/O.
> 
> It also makes me think that upping my min_cf past 11 is also well worth it.

:)  Just remember, that data is on a corpus of messages that are scanned
all at one time.  ie: the "live" Razor results are likely to be different
due to # of reports, revokes, etc.

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"I prefer to call it the Prime Suggestion" - Kirk

pgpaUhMMUK1Ut.pgp
Description: PGP signature