On Sat, 08 Oct 2005 the mental interface of
Arias Hung told:
> On Sat, 08 Oct 2005, Elimar Riesebieter delivered in simple text monotone:
[...]
> >Does it make sense to use gpgme with mutt-ng?
> snip---->
>
> Was wondering what you might have been implying by 'does it make sense' ?
> Does using gpgme as opposed to smime pose any other usability/logistical
> challenges that make it nonsensical in your experience?
I am thinking about to provide gpgme to the Debian package.
The only advantage I see is the use of gpg-agent for the passphrase.
But within mutt-ng passphrase timeout is controlled via
$pgp_timeout as well.
I fiddeled around gpgme. Starting a gpg-agent via .xsession or
something similar is ok. I have to start it in a vt, where pinentry
doesn't work correctly. I can't send signed messages, because there
is no chance to tell the gpg-agent my passphrase. Maybe I've
overseen something?
Elimar
--
You cannot propel yourself forward by
patting yourself on the back.
|
