|
Mailspool location (was: Debian mutt-ng_0.0+20050831-1_i390.deb): msg#00085mail.mutt.mutt-ng.user
Hi, * Elimar Riesebieter [05-09-11 18:11:18 +0200] wrote: On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 the mental interface of [ /var/mail safe ] In such cases it's the admins fault. Mailspools outside of $HOME This seems to be nfs exported var/spools? Of course. Hey, come on, spooldirs are Having spools local is just as evil because you have two options: either people get direct logins on the incomming mail server or one sets up IMAP on the incomming server, too. IMHO this is bad because the only thing the _incomming_ mail server has to do is to accept incomming mail and just run rock-stable software only. Interactive jobs have IMHO nothing to do on such a critical machine (I'm speaking of possibly hundreds of _untrusted_ users; when you can choose who gets a login the situation is different). Software like an IMAP daemon may cause lots of workload (for hundreds of users) and may have security issues in which case one may open up the incomming mail server remotely. On the other hand, NFS is just as bad as it doesn't provide any real security. From my experience, I've seen more networks using the NFS method and disabling logins and all additional software on critical machines. bye, Rocco -- :wq! |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Debian mutt-ng_0.0+20050831-1_i390.deb: 00085, Elimar Riesebieter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Debian mutt-ng_0.0+20050831-1_i390.deb: 00085, Peter J. Holzer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Debian mutt-ng_0.0+20050831-1_i390.debi: 00085, Elimar Riesebieter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Debian mutt-ng_0.0+20050831-1_i390.deb: 00085, Philippe Berini |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |