* Sven Guckes <maillist-mutt-ng@xxxxxxxxxx> [2005-03-09 13:29]:
> * Markus Moebs <markus.moebs@xxxxxx> [2005-03-08 14:36]:
> > Lars Noschinski:
> > > # Comment \
> > > set realname = "Lars Noschinski"
> > >
> > > is interpreted like
> > >
> > > # Comment
> > > # set realname = "Lars Noschinski"
> > >
> > > Maybe this behaviour should be changed.
[...]
> again - it is what you expect after thinking about it.
You can expect it in both ways. If you interpret '#' like shell scripts
do, you get my expectation.
> and, yes, it does have its use, too, as Markus found.
> so let's please leave it as it is - and simply give
> the users an example on how to make use of it.
> a little redundancy can help a lot here!
It also has disadvantages. Say, I'm playing around with some hooks,
trying to find an error in a regex.
# folder-hook <very-specific-regex> \
folder-hook <slightly-less-specfic-regex> \
"set from = \"foobar@xxxxxxxxxxx\"
And my folder hook will never match ... But as long as our config looks
like a muttrc, it should probably behave like a muttrc.
|
