logo       

Re: Stability of log4net: msg#00074

log.log4net.user

Subject: Re: Stability of log4net

We're using log4net (the DLL version is 1.2.1.40796) in systems that
require 24x7 reliability and haven't had any problems at all with
either the RollingFileAppender or the TraceAppender on either single-
or multi-processor servers (Windows 2003). I've got no qualms about
using it in production, myself.


On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:27:00 +0100, Dag Christensen
<Dag.Christensen@xxxxxx> wrote:
> We have been using log4net in production since Summer 2002, and have
> experienced no problems (even on SMP servers). We're using 1.2.0 beta 8
> now. Appenders we use are RollingFileAppender and ConsoleAppender (with
> PatternLayout).
>
> Regards,
>
> Dag Christensen
> Vestfold Butikkdata AS
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Slatcher [mailto:steve_slatcher@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 17. februar 2005 12:19
> To: log4net-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Stability of log4net
>
> Hi guys
>
> I am currently evaluating log4net for use in a new project. I am
> already familiar with log4j so feel pretty comforatble with the feature
> set. The only concern is that log4net is no longer being maintained,
> and that there are only beta releases of 1.2.
>
> Do you think log4net is OK for production code? Are there any
> particular versions to go for from a stability point of view, or
> versions to avoid?
>
> Cheers
>
>


--
Eric Means
eric.means@xxxxxxxxx
http://www.randomtree.org/eric/



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise