|
Re: Stability of log4net: msg#00066log.log4net.user
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 11:19:18AM -0000, Steve Slatcher wrote: > I am currently evaluating log4net for use in a new project. I am already > familiar with log4j so feel pretty comforatble with the feature set. The > only concern is that log4net is no longer being maintained, and that there > are only beta releases of 1.2. > > Do you think log4net is OK for production code? Are there any particular > versions to go for from a stability point of view, or versions to avoid? We've had some problems on SMP machines when logging from multiple threads at the same time to the same logger. We're using the RollingFileAppender for output. Sometimes the logging has stopped completly (it would start again if we touched the configuration file, causing it to be reloaded), sometimes we've had two log entries being interleaved in the same line in the log file! Setting the affinity to one processor has solved it for us. This is with the beta8 release. /Sebastian -- .oooO o,o Oooo. ( ) \_/ ( ) (o_ "Life is not fair, but root \ ( /|\ ) / (o_ //\ password helps!" -- The BOFH \_) (_/ (/)_ V_/_ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | ADONetAppender: 00066, Ping Xie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Stability of log4net: 00066, Dag Christensen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ADONetAppenderi: 00066, Ping Xie |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Stability of log4net: 00066, Dag Christensen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |