|
Re: Stability of log4net: msg#00063log.log4net.user
log4net-1.2.0-beta8 BTW- Don't let the "beta" tag fool you. It's been a while since I used log4j, but isn't it classified as beta also? I think this is just an attribute of open source projects as they are never really finished; someone is ALWAYS adding a new feature... :-) Barry --- Steve Slatcher <steve_slatcher@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Barry Burton wrote: > > > We have been using log4net for almost a year now > > without any issues. Most of the problems you see > are > > the result of invalid configurations, not log4net > > itself. I am just one voice, but I would have no > > problem recommending log4net for production code. > > Thanks Barry. May I ask which version(s) you are > using? > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Stability of log4net: 00063, Steve Slatcher |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Stability of log4net: 00063, Steve Slatcher |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Stability of log4neti: 00063, Steve Slatcher |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Stability of log4net: 00063, Steve Slatcher |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |