|
Re: Stability of log4net: msg#00061log.log4net.user
Steve - We have been using log4net for almost a year now without any issues. Most of the problems you see are the result of invalid configurations, not log4net itself. I am just one voice, but I would have no problem recommending log4net for production code. Barry Burton Senior Engineer UAG --- Steve Slatcher <steve_slatcher@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi guys > > I am currently evaluating log4net for use in a new > project. I am already > familiar with log4j so feel pretty comforatble with > the feature set. The > only concern is that log4net is no longer being > maintained, and that there > are only beta releases of 1.2. > > Do you think log4net is OK for production code? Are > there any particular > versions to go for from a stability point of view, > or versions to avoid? > > Cheers > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Stability of log4net: 00061, Steve Slatcher |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Stability of log4net: 00061, Steve Slatcher |
| Previous by Thread: | Stability of log4neti: 00061, Steve Slatcher |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Stability of log4net: 00061, Steve Slatcher |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |