|
Re: Question: msg#00113lisp.scheme.chicken
On 12/27/05, Raffael Cavallaro <raffaelcavallaro@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > If we turn this into a wish list, my only wish for Chicken is that we would > have a means of launching certain threads in their own independent runtime > (i.e., a separate unix process) so that certain worker threads could utilize > the mulitple cpus/cpu cores which will become increasingly common in the > next year or so. I suspect this would be easier than rewriting the guts of > Chicken so that threads were real OS threads capable of running on separate > cores simultaneously. Real OS-level multithreading is currently not posssible for Scheme code, but separate processes might actually be a working alternative. What we need is some efficient method of exchanging data between processes. Perhaps serialization over shared memory? Well, I guess I have to do some benchmarking... cheers, felix |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | sxml-transforms + objc eggs updated: 00113, felix winkelmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Question: 00113, Raffael Cavallaro |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Questioni: 00113, Harri Haataja |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Question: 00113, Raffael Cavallaro |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |