|
|
Re: Severe performance regression with latest CVS sources?: msg#00039lisp.mcclim.devel
Paolo Amoroso <amoroso@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Less than 0.9 s with 2006-04-10. I think there is enough information > to identify the relevant changes. Do you need more tests? More precisely, as low as 0.75 s (2006-04-10). Paolo -- Lisp Propulsion Laboratory log - http://www.paoloamoroso.it/log |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Severe performance regression with latest CVS sources?: 00039, Paolo Amoroso |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | accept-values-pane and views: 00039, Paul Werkowski |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Severe performance regression with latest CVS sources?i: 00039, Paolo Amoroso |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Severe performance regression with latest CVS sources?: 00039, Christophe Rhodes |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |