|
Re: Severe performance regression with latest CVS sources?: msg#00037lisp.mcclim.devel
Paolo Amoroso <amoroso@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Paolo Amoroso <amoroso@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> I have checked out a fresh copy of McCLIM's CVS sources with: >> >> cvs co -D 2006-03-25 mcclim >> >> The test: >> >> (time (clim-listener::com-show-class-subclasses t)) >> >> takes about 0.92 s on the same system, i.e. a 2.8 GHz Pentium IV > > With sources checked out with the -D 2006-04-05 option, I get times > around 0.9 s. Bother. So if you do get times of 15s from HEAD, then it is Andy's bookkeeping / graph edge stuff. Darn. Christophe |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Severe performance regression with latest CVS sources?: 00037, Paolo Amoroso |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Severe performance regression with latest CVS sources?: 00037, Paolo Amoroso |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Severe performance regression with latest CVS sources?i: 00037, Paolo Amoroso |
| Next by Thread: | accept-values-pane and views: 00037, Paul Werkowski |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |