|
Re: Severe performance regression with latest CVS sources?: msg#00031lisp.mcclim.devel
Is this with or without Christophe's commit from today of my graph edge patch? I've never looked at the performance impact of that on large graphs. On 4/10/06, Paolo Amoroso <amoroso@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Troels Henriksen <athas@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > This is with CLIM-desktop and some minor stuff loaded. Are you sure > > you are not running with more loaded classes now than the last time > > you ran the test? > > For such tests I use a freshly loaded CLIM Listener, with nothing > else. Can the additional classes justify an order of magnitude > difference in performance? > > > Paolo > -- > Lisp Propulsion Laboratory log - http://www.paoloamoroso.it/log > _______________________________________________ > mcclim-devel mailing list > mcclim-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mcclim-devel > |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Severe performance regression with latest CVS sources?: 00031, Paolo Amoroso |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Severe performance regression with latest CVS sources?: 00031, Paolo Amoroso |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Severe performance regression with latest CVS sources?i: 00031, Paolo Amoroso |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Severe performance regression with latest CVS sources?: 00031, Paolo Amoroso |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |