|
Re: gtkairo: msg#00023lisp.mcclim.devel
Quoting C Y (smustudent1@xxxxxxxxx): > Coool! Are there any specific versions of CFFI, and specific lisps > that are needed, or should it work wherever CFFI does? Tested only on SBCL, but no inherent portability issues. One exception perhaps: If you are using one of the Lisps with userland threads that do not like blocking in native code, look for the the call to sb-sys:wait-until-fd-usable in event.lisp and find a replacement. And the other big problem was pointed out by Christophe: The original tarball is not 64 bit clean. The attached patch fixes that (tested briefly on SBCL/x86-64). David
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: gtkairo: 00023, C Y |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Severe performance regression with latest CVS sources?: 00023, Paolo Amoroso |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: gtkairoi: 00023, C Y |
| Next by Thread: | Re: gtkairo: 00023, Christophe Rhodes |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |