|
Re: Severe performance regression with latest CVS sources?: msg#00021lisp.mcclim.devel
Paolo Amoroso <amoroso@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Can anybody confirm this? On my 1100MHz Athlon with 512MiB of RAM, that operation gives the following timing output: Evaluation took: 5.514 seconds of real time 5.418177 seconds of user run time 0.094985 seconds of system run time 0 page faults and 61,853,896 bytes consed. This is with CLIM-desktop and some minor stuff loaded. Are you sure you are not running with more loaded classes now than the last time you ran the test? -- \ Troels "Athas" Henriksen /\ - Insert witty signature |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Severe performance regression with latest CVS sources?: 00021, Paolo Amoroso |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: gtkairo: 00021, C Y |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Severe performance regression with latest CVS sources?i: 00021, Paolo Amoroso |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Severe performance regression with latest CVS sources?: 00021, Paolo Amoroso |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |