|
Re: Status update: CMUCL port to Darwin/OS X: msg#00005lisp.cmucl.devel
>>>>> "Edi" == Edi Weitz <edi@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: Edi> Otherwise, what are the main differences (things to watch out for) Edi> compared to the x86 version (the only one I'm familiar with)? GC? Edi> Other things? Pierre would know best of course, but I would suspect that the PPC port is more like the Sparc port featurewise except that it's probably less stable at this time. I expect that will improve, and probably surpass Sparc in time. This port probably still uses the Cheney stop-and-copy collector, but I have an interest in porting gencgc to PPC. However, that's already been attempted on sbcl without success thus far, so it seems a difficult task. Ray -- -- Ericsson automatically adds the following disclaimer. Sorry, it's beyond my control. This communication is confidential and intended solely for the addressee(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you believe this message has been sent to you in error, please notify the sender by replying to this transmission and delete the message without disclosing it. Thank you. E-mail including attachments is susceptible to data corruption, interruption, unauthorized amendment, tampering and viruses, and we only send and receive e-mails on the basis that we are not liable for any such corruption, interception, amendment, tampering or viruses or any consequences thereof. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Status update: CMUCL port to Darwin/OS X: 00005, Edi Weitz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Status update: CMUCL port to Darwin/OS X: 00005, Raymond Toy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Status update: CMUCL port to Darwin/OS Xi: 00005, Edi Weitz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Status update: CMUCL port to Darwin/OS X: 00005, Pierre R. Mai |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |