CL-HTTP compiles & run OK after disabling LW's default protection of
the CLIM package it includes. I'm not sure about the relative
performance yet, though it doesn't seem too much different than under
4.1. I've not yet experimented with various compiler settings.
There appears to be a significant correspondence between cl-http's
CLIM routines & those supplied by LW 4.2. Are there arguments against
using LW 4.2's CLIM routines instead of cl-http's versions? I think I
am sufficiently competent to give that a try, but a hint or two of
direction would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Greg Menke
|